What Do We Mean By "AI Literacy"?
Tensions in Current Institutional Guidelines and Recommendations for a Slow, Reflective Future
Keywords:
Generative artificial intelligence, AI literacy, Writing pedagogy, Reflection, Slow pedagogyAbstract
This article examines how educators navigate tensions between efficiency-driven integration and critical approaches to generative AI literacy. Through thematic analysis of twelve institutional AI frameworks and collaborative autoethnographic reflections, we identify significant gaps between policy aspirations and pedagogical realities. While institutions converge around principles of human oversight and ethical consideration, educators face challenges including time constraints and tensions between preparing students for AI-integrated futures while maintaining critical perspectives. We propose a “slow pedagogy” approach that resists efficiency-driven integration in favor of deliberate, justice-centered engagement, offering a reflective heuristic for practitioners across educational contexts.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Katlynne Davis, Jason Tham, Danielle Mollie Stambler, Jialei Jiang, Jessica Campbell, Gustav Verhulsdonck, Daniel Hocutt

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.